<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox taking wrong lessons from Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arteki.com/firefox-taking-wrong-lessons-from-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arteki.com/firefox-taking-wrong-lessons-from-chrome/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:15:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4541</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaby</title>
		<link>http://www.arteki.com/firefox-taking-wrong-lessons-from-chrome/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arteki.com/?p=325#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

If you click the &quot;Subscribe by RSS&quot; link it should take you to a page that offers you a choice of which reader to subscribe with.

Alternatively, you could give your feed reader the feed URL directly: http://feeds.feedburner.com/arteki

Are you getting any errors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>If you click the &#8220;Subscribe by RSS&#8221; link it should take you to a page that offers you a choice of which reader to subscribe with.</p>
<p>Alternatively, you could give your feed reader the feed URL directly: <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/arteki" rel="nofollow">http://feeds.feedburner.com/arteki</a></p>
<p>Are you getting any errors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heriberto Raeside</title>
		<link>http://www.arteki.com/firefox-taking-wrong-lessons-from-chrome/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Heriberto Raeside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arteki.com/?p=325#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>I wanted to add your site to my feed reader, but it won&#039;t let me.  Any idea what I am doing wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to add your site to my feed reader, but it won&#8217;t let me.  Any idea what I am doing wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaby</title>
		<link>http://www.arteki.com/firefox-taking-wrong-lessons-from-chrome/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arteki.com/?p=325#comment-995</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s definitely something Firefox, and many other programs, need to work on. Many people, myself included, can get frustrated if a program doesn&#039;t load very fast, or as fast as a similar program.

I&#039;ll have to take a look at speedyfox, thanks for mentioning it. Thanks also for leaving a comment, I really love the interaction with readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s definitely something Firefox, and many other programs, need to work on. Many people, myself included, can get frustrated if a program doesn&#8217;t load very fast, or as fast as a similar program.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to take a look at speedyfox, thanks for mentioning it. Thanks also for leaving a comment, I really love the interaction with readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mohan Arun L</title>
		<link>http://www.arteki.com/firefox-taking-wrong-lessons-from-chrome/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Mohan Arun L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arteki.com/?p=325#comment-992</guid>
		<description>I have Options&gt;Advanced&gt;Update ticked off, but Firefox is still extremely slow to startup. I used speedyfox to try to make it load faster the first time but it is still v.slow. And I have 1.25 GB RAM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have Options&gt;Advanced&gt;Update ticked off, but Firefox is still extremely slow to startup. I used speedyfox to try to make it load faster the first time but it is still v.slow. And I have 1.25 GB RAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaby</title>
		<link>http://www.arteki.com/firefox-taking-wrong-lessons-from-chrome/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arteki.com/?p=325#comment-954</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for such an in depth comment! You are completely correct about Google Updater. When I wrote this I had completely forgotten about it (clearly). I actually disabled it in msconfig on my new laptop yesterday, having remembered it. I will update the post to mention it.

Perhaps I ought to write a post about how all these things run in the background - and that they really shouldn&#039;t without at least telling you. It&#039;s no surprise that people who aren&#039;t used to using computers find their computers gradually slow down - it&#039;s all those background processes and services that build up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for such an in depth comment! You are completely correct about Google Updater. When I wrote this I had completely forgotten about it (clearly). I actually disabled it in msconfig on my new laptop yesterday, having remembered it. I will update the post to mention it.</p>
<p>Perhaps I ought to write a post about how all these things run in the background &#8211; and that they really shouldn&#8217;t without at least telling you. It&#8217;s no surprise that people who aren&#8217;t used to using computers find their computers gradually slow down &#8211; it&#8217;s all those background processes and services that build up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Octavian</title>
		<link>http://www.arteki.com/firefox-taking-wrong-lessons-from-chrome/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Octavian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arteki.com/?p=325#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Well, before getting too deep on it, I suggest you get your hands on Process Explorer, once a product of SysInternals, then bought by Microsoft. Using Process Explorer, if you got Chrome installed, you will see a process belonging to Google, &quot;Google Updater&quot;. That, my friend, is a service. Remains running all the time while you work, whether or not you start Chrome during a Windows work session.
Try to kill it - it will spawned back again. It will still be there if you disable the update check from the browser settings and if you remove it from starting too at system startup.

Soooo... amazingly... Chrome does not need to check for updates itself since the Updater does just that. All the time.

Chrome&#039;s speed might also be increased by that update, which could preload required libraries at system startup. Just a shot in the dark, but face it: since you already have one of your products un and running, why not make sure the others also get some benefit out of it?

If they do implement that silly tab-as-window feature, I truly hope it will be toggle-able. I hate it.

Multithreading you say... well... using the exact Process Explorer as above, start Chrome and open a few tabs, each with a different website. Check P.E. - you will see a tree of processes, all chrome.exe, the first being the one you started, the others being one for each new tab. This is how the &quot;tabs&quot; can dock and undock from the parent application. The same applies to Internet Explorer - one mother application, several tab-sons. I.E. does not allow (yet, unless a mad dev at MS will implement the silly feature there too) undocking tabs from the parent instance, but it does the same in the memory.

The system is not new, MS uses it for all its Office products - one application server and several application clients, as many as the number of documents you have opened. Check Excel and Word - Word for sure, since early versions, I had my chance on running programmatic mail merge using Delphi for coding and Word for that feature, used for report and document generation.

The first concern Mozilla has to tackle is the faulty memory management. It&#039;s not that OK to get a browser at 1GB of occupied memory. That, on my 7 year old PC, with XP on it and 768MB DDR RAM. It&#039;s a real pain always having the system use the HDD for extra memory, since the physical memory is swamped. And when I tried to close it, it would remain in memory for 30-45-60 minutes before closing. I could guess why (due to hmm 20-40 tabs opened? deviantArt is a pain at that, I&#039;ll give you that :-) ), though...

Don&#039;t let the glimmering outfit, feature list or rumors catch your eyes, there is more to it than just nice images. The &quot;software doing everything for you&quot; means you get less control - at least, as Chrome feels to me now.

And about Windows Automatic Updates. They are checked and downloaded even if you have disabled them in the fancy dialog. The only way you get them stopped is by canceling the AutoUpdates service. :-)

So, you thought you own your own PC, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, before getting too deep on it, I suggest you get your hands on Process Explorer, once a product of SysInternals, then bought by Microsoft. Using Process Explorer, if you got Chrome installed, you will see a process belonging to Google, &#8220;Google Updater&#8221;. That, my friend, is a service. Remains running all the time while you work, whether or not you start Chrome during a Windows work session.<br />
Try to kill it &#8211; it will spawned back again. It will still be there if you disable the update check from the browser settings and if you remove it from starting too at system startup.</p>
<p>Soooo&#8230; amazingly&#8230; Chrome does not need to check for updates itself since the Updater does just that. All the time.</p>
<p>Chrome&#8217;s speed might also be increased by that update, which could preload required libraries at system startup. Just a shot in the dark, but face it: since you already have one of your products un and running, why not make sure the others also get some benefit out of it?</p>
<p>If they do implement that silly tab-as-window feature, I truly hope it will be toggle-able. I hate it.</p>
<p>Multithreading you say&#8230; well&#8230; using the exact Process Explorer as above, start Chrome and open a few tabs, each with a different website. Check P.E. &#8211; you will see a tree of processes, all chrome.exe, the first being the one you started, the others being one for each new tab. This is how the &#8220;tabs&#8221; can dock and undock from the parent application. The same applies to Internet Explorer &#8211; one mother application, several tab-sons. I.E. does not allow (yet, unless a mad dev at MS will implement the silly feature there too) undocking tabs from the parent instance, but it does the same in the memory.</p>
<p>The system is not new, MS uses it for all its Office products &#8211; one application server and several application clients, as many as the number of documents you have opened. Check Excel and Word &#8211; Word for sure, since early versions, I had my chance on running programmatic mail merge using Delphi for coding and Word for that feature, used for report and document generation.</p>
<p>The first concern Mozilla has to tackle is the faulty memory management. It&#8217;s not that OK to get a browser at 1GB of occupied memory. That, on my 7 year old PC, with XP on it and 768MB DDR RAM. It&#8217;s a real pain always having the system use the HDD for extra memory, since the physical memory is swamped. And when I tried to close it, it would remain in memory for 30-45-60 minutes before closing. I could guess why (due to hmm 20-40 tabs opened? deviantArt is a pain at that, I&#8217;ll give you that <img src='http://www.arteki.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ), though&#8230;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t let the glimmering outfit, feature list or rumors catch your eyes, there is more to it than just nice images. The &#8220;software doing everything for you&#8221; means you get less control &#8211; at least, as Chrome feels to me now.</p>
<p>And about Windows Automatic Updates. They are checked and downloaded even if you have disabled them in the fancy dialog. The only way you get them stopped is by canceling the AutoUpdates service. <img src='http://www.arteki.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So, you thought you own your own PC, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firefox taking wrong lessons from Chrome &#124; Arteki &#124; Firefox News on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.arteki.com/firefox-taking-wrong-lessons-from-chrome/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Firefox taking wrong lessons from Chrome &#124; Arteki &#124; Firefox News on Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arteki.com/?p=325#comment-908</guid>
		<description>[...] Read this article: Firefox taking wrong lessons from Chrome &#124; Arteki [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read this article: Firefox taking wrong lessons from Chrome | Arteki [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
